<p>Tomb M. Vipsanius Agrippa built for himself in the *Campus Martius before his ashes were interred in the *Mausoleum of Augustus (Dio Cass. 54.28.5). Recently the tomb, which must have functioned as a cenotaph (La Rocca, <i>LTUR</i>), has been tentatively associated with the remains of 5 parallel walls of peperino, each pierced by an opening 1.9 m wide, that were found in the 1880s under Via Vittorio Emanuele in the area of the Vallicella (La Rocca 1984). A large fragment (L. 2.8 m) of a monumental altar <i>pulvinus</i> (bolster) was found within the trench (Gatti; fragment now in the Museo dei Conservatori). Published as the *Tarentum, Lanciani reconstructed the building as a series of three precincts, one inside the other, with openings on three of the four façades and an altar placed atop a flight of three steps in the innermost chamber. This interpretation endured, and was adopted by scholars, until 1947 when it was proven that the Tarentum was located elsewhere (Castagnoli 152-57). Recent reexamination of the building materials and techniques suggests a late-Republican or early-Augustan date for the structure, while the sculptural decoration of the <i>pulvinus</i> can be ascribed to a relatively narrow chronological period early in the Augustan principate (La Rocca 1984; contra, Wiseman, who holds that the rarity of the sculpted motif, undulating leaves, in Rome limits its use as a dating criteria). However, the <i>pulvinus</i> was not necessarily found in its original location; as no other altar remains were found, it may have been taken to the site as <i>spolia</i>, since several late-Imperial workshops where marble fragments were re-carved are known in the W *Campus Martius (s.v. *Sepulcrum: A. Hirtius, esp. Nogara on Domitianic relief fragments found there; cf. Colini for a Tiberian compital altar and an unused 4th-c. column capital). Given the uncertainties surrounding the <i>pulvinus</i>, the unusual building remains, and the absence of corroborative testimony to support that of Dio Cassius, it is difficult to sustain an association with Agrippa’s tomb. Thus, the late-Republican structure is shown on our map, and its identification is left open.</p>